IDM Framework Discussion

From ITUwiki

Revision as of 14:52, 16 February 2007 by Kaliya (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

[edit] From the White Board

  • Use and Bridge Existing Things
  • Not creating New Things (unless needed)
  • Global Harmonization (terms)
  • Global Perspective
  • End Users (people and enterprises) are important
  • Collaboration
  • Diverse Non-Homoginous Gathering
Good Ice-Melting needed


[edit] Notes On Frameworks

when do we need identity? Identity Services -

The need is a common data model for operators ..

Data Model - Schema, conceptual framework, syntax, conceptual framework Meta-Model - a language where data models can be discussed

Proposal for a goal of - Minimum set of working requirements under the topics that we find.. eg, service identity with network identity minimum set of functions

Threat that web services will fall prey to smart networks

Network providers want to move up in the value chain - providing virtualisation and intelligence into

If not able to get policy framework together national and international interests will impose framewroks.

Common model that will exchange, The big three,


Working out a superset -- What should the working groups be?

  • Legal - Privacy - Public Private
  • Network Centric
  • User Centric
  • Application Centric - Enterprise, web services

Meta-Model Bridging the islands, multi-layer - public/private -

- Need for a picture for the development of a working groups and structures.

Outcome of this is to have reports and bringing together the outcomes that are social relationship.

The living list – used as a holding place for bits that are important but yet to be used and is looking for integration – there is a living list in the charter that is different from this,